mmr.fadf.ieu.edu.tr
Course Name | |
Code | Semester | Theory (hour/week) | Application/Lab (hour/week) | Local Credits | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fall |
Prerequisites | None | |||||
Course Language | ||||||
Course Type | Required | |||||
Course Level | - | |||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | DiscussionQ&A | |||||
Course Coordinator | ||||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | |
Learning Outcomes | The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Description |
| Core Courses | X |
Major Area Courses | ||
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Managment Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
Week | Subjects | Required Materials |
1 | Introduction | None |
2 | Composition | Reading: “Proportion,”from Art Fundamentals, pp. 5660. |
3 | Color | Reading: “Simultaneous Contrast,” Art Fundamentals, pp. 156161. |
4 | Holiday | None |
5 | Light | Reading: “Chiascuro & Tenebrism,” Art Fundamentals, pp. 116119. |
6 | Movie Screening | None |
7 | MidTerm 1 | None |
8 | Texture | Reading: “Texture, Pattern, Composition,” Art Fundamentals, pp. 136139. |
9 | Space | Reading: “Line, Shape, Value, Texture, Color, Space,”Art Fundamentals, pp. 202207. |
10 | Time | Reading: “Motion Pictures, Video, the Computer and Art,”Art Fundamentals, pp. 213215. |
11 | Review of readings and lectures | None |
12 | MidTerm 2 | None |
13 | Representation | Reading: Ernst Gombrich, “Pygmalion’s Power,” Art and Illusion,pp. 8083. |
14 | Text | Reading: Janet Marquardt and Stephen Eskilson, “AfricanAmerican Art History,” Frames of Reference, pp. 329332. |
15 | Review of readings and lectures | None |
16 | Review of the semester | None |
Course Notes/Textbooks | None |
Suggested Readings/Materials | Art Fundamentals: Theory and Practice. Otto G. Ocvirk, Robert E. Stinton, Philip R. Wigg, Robert O. Bone and David L. Cayton. McGraw Hill: New York, 2006.Ernst Gombrich, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Phaidon Press: London, 2002 (6th edition).Janet Marquardt and Stephen Eskilson, Frames of Reference: Art, History and the World. McGraw Hill: New York, 2005 (16th edition). |
Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
Participation | ||
Laboratory / Application | ||
Field Work | ||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
Portfolio | ||
Homework / Assignments | ||
Presentation / Jury | ||
Project | 1 | 25 |
Seminar / Workshop | ||
Oral Exam | ||
Midterm | 2 | 50 |
Final Exam | 1 | 25 |
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 4 | 75 |
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 1 | 25 |
Total |
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | 2 | 32 |
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | ||
Study Hours Out of Class | |||
Field Work | |||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | |||
Portfolio | |||
Homework / Assignments | |||
Presentation / Jury | |||
Project | 1 | 16 | |
Seminar / Workshop | |||
Oral Exam | |||
Midterms | 2 | 15 | |
Final Exams | 1 | 15 | |
Total | 93 |
# | Program Competencies/Outcomes | * Contribution Level | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | Ability to apply theoretical and technical knowledge in architecture. | X | ||||
2 | Ability to understand, interpret and evaluate architectural concepts and theories. | X | ||||
3 | Ability to take on responsibility as an individual and as a team member to solve complex problems in the practice of architecture.
| X | ||||
4 | Critical evaluation of acquired knowledge and skills to diagnose individual educational needs and to direct self-education. | X | ||||
5 | Ability to communicate architectural ideas and proposals for solutions to architectural problems in visual, written and oral form. | X | ||||
6 | Ability to support architectural thoughts and proposals for solutions to architectural problems with qualitative and quantitative data and to communicate these with specialists and non-specialists. | X | ||||
7 | Ability to use a foreign language to follow developments in architecture and to communicate with colleagues. | X | ||||
8 | Ability to use digital information and communication technologies at a level that is adequate to the discipline of architecture. | X | ||||
9 | Being equipped with social, scientific and ethical values in the accumulation, interpretation and/or application of architectural data. | X | ||||
10 | Ability to collaborate with other disciplines that are directly or indirectly related to architecture with basic knowledge in these disciplines. | X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest